Cyflwynwyd yr ymateb hwn
i’r ymgynghoriad ar y
Bil Bwyd (Cymru) Drafft
This response was submitted to
the consultation on the
Draft Food (Wales) Bill
OSFB002
Ymateb gan: | Response from: Unigolyn | An
individual
Overarching principles
Question 1: Do you agree with the overarching principles that
the Bill seeks to achieve?
Yes
As a community development worker, I have
witnessed a significant increase in the number of people having to
access foodbanks and other community based emergency food providers
(including Community Pantries). Salaries and benefits allowances
are not keeping up with the increasing costs average community
members are facing. In the absence of increasing income to match,
the only thing that can be done it to ensure supplies of food are
kept within affordable parameters.
Question 2: Do you think there is a need for this legislation?
Can you provide reasons for your answer.
Yes
People need to be able to afford to eat. The
more recent drastic increases to costs of fuel and utilities means
more families are struggling, and poorer households suffer the
most. More and more families are having to skip meals and choose to
heat their homes or feed their kids. There are more "in work"
households having to access additional support to feed their
families. When there is a family with 2 parents present, both
working full time, and they still can't afford to provide enough
food to fill their children's bellies, action must be taken.
Food Goals
Question 3: Please provide your views on the inclusion of the
Food Goals within the Bill as the means to underpin the policy
objectives.
I agree that food goals should be included
with v view to measuring the impact of this Bill.
Question 4: Do you agree with the inclusion of a Primary Food
Goal supplemented by Secondary Food Goals?
I agree with the Primary and secondary
targets. Accessibility to affordable and healthy food should be the
priority.
Question 5: Are there additional / different areas you think
should be included in the Food Goals?
Secondary targets could include additional
benefits to businesses and organisation taking positive action to
make food more readily available to struggling community members.
Perhaps discounted rates to food retail outlets offering low
cost/healthy/affordable options. I also believe that public bodies
could contribute more towards the running costs of third sector
food providers that offer crisis food support to community
members.
Question 6: Do you have any additional comments on the Food
Goals, including the resource implications of the proposals and how
these could be minimised?
I think that in paragraph 29) the duty on
"public bodies" should be to take positive action rather than
reasonable steps. This is an urgent matter and many people are
going hungry.
Question 7: Please provide your views on the inclusion of
targets within the Bill as the means to measure how the Food Goals
are being advanced.
I agree with the inclusion of targets. They
are essential to measure the positive impact as well as any
potential lack of progress.
Question 8: Do you agree with the process for setting the
targets?
This process could include consultation with
community activists involved on the distribution of crisis food
parcels to community members. Not just Trussell Trust. There are
many groups and organisations contributing in this way and their
work goes largely unmeasured as there is no collective collation of
data around the work they do.
Question 9: Do you think the reporting mechanisms set out in
the draft Bill provide sufficient accountability and scope for
scrutiny?
Yes.
Question 10: Do you have any additional comments on the
targets, including the resource implications of the proposals and
how these could be minimised?
My concern is that Ministers with the power to
review targets could lower them to make them more achievable/less
challenging.
Wales Food Commission
Question 11: What are your views on the need for a Welsh Food
Commission?
Agree that this is required
Question 12: Do you agree with the goals and functions of the
Welsh Food Commission? If not, what changes would you suggest?
Yes
Question 13: Do you agree with the size of the membership of
the Food Commission and the process for appointing its
members?
Question 14: What are your views on the proposal that the chair
and members can serve a maximum term of five years and that an
individual may be re-appointed as a chair or member only once? Do
you believe this is appropriate?
Yes
Question 15: Do you have any additional comments on the Food
Commission, including the resource implications of the proposals
and how these could be minimised?
It is a concern that the commission can
regulate its own procedures (including any quorum)
National Food Strategy
Question 16: Do you agree that there is a need for a national
food strategy?
Yes
Question 17: Do you believe the Welsh Government’s
current strategies relating to ‘food’ are sufficiently
joined up / coherent?
No
Question 18: Does the draft Bill do enough to ensure that Welsh
Ministers take advice and consult on the strategy before it is
made. If no, what additional mechanisms would you put in
place?
Suggest that there is more consultation with
organisations and groups that operate at the front line of
providing crisis food packages to the community. Not just Trussell
Trust Food banks - there are many independent groups and
organisations doing this work. Suggest establishing Networks of
such groups that can consult with network members and feed up
information/data/issues.
Question 19: Do you think the provisions of the draft Bill
relating to reporting on the national food strategy are sufficient?
If not, what changes would you like to see?
I would like to see a shorter timescale for
the first report - 12 months rather than 2 years and continuing
with annual reporting.
Question 20: Do you think the provisions of the draft Bill
relating to reviewing of the national food strategy are sufficient?
If not, what changes would you like to see?
Yes
Question 21: Do you have any additional comments on the
National Food Strategy, including the resource implications of the
proposals and how these could be minimised?
Local Food Plans
Question 22: Do you agree that there is a need for local food
plans?
Yes
Question 23: Does the draft Bill do enough to ensure that
public bodies consult on their local food plans before they are
made. If no, what additional mechanisms would you put in
place?
Establish local third sector food networks
that can feed data in to these plans.
Question 24: Do you think the provisions of the draft Bill
relating to reporting on the local food plans are sufficient? If
not, what changes would you like to see?
Further consultation at grass roots level
Question 25: Do you think the provisions of the draft Bill
relating to reviewing of the local food plans are sufficient? If
not, what changes would you like to see?
Stronger expectations of establishing
sustainable food systems
Question 26: Do you have any additional comments on local food
plans, including the resource implications of the proposals and how
these could be minimised?
Increase support to food banks/local community
food providers to help meet the increase in demand and the
increasing revenue costs associated with running such services.
General Provisions
Question 27: Do you agree with the list of persons defined as
being a ‘public body’ for the purpose of this
Bill?
Yes
Question 28: Do you have any views on the process for making
regulations set out in the Bill?
Question 29: Do you have any views on the proposed commencement
date for the Act?
The sooner, the better
General Views
Please provide any additional information relevant to the draft
Bill.